// you’re reading...

ARTICLES Index

Carl Doesn’t Know Jack or Dick

Dick Sittig, the marketing genius behind the Jack-in-the-Box ad campaigns, has created a commercial concept so powerful that he now has rival Carl’s Jr. helping him spread the word. How? By being so funny and acerbic that Carl’s is trying to sue for relief.

I have long wanted to write about the off-the-wall humor in the advertising for Jack in the Box (JITB) restaurants, a West Coast-based fast-food firm. While they are a good-sized company ($2.7-billion in sales), JITB is not a national chain (their locations are in only 17 states).

Under the direction of Dick Sittig, the Jack advertising has consistently stood out from the clutter, succinctly demonstrated their product advantages, and almost always made viewers smile.

Scott G in the studioThe humor ranges from mainstream to delightfully warped, as might be expected from creatives at an ad agency called the Kowloon Wholesale Fish Company (although to save their receptionist from too many calls from food distributors they are dba Secret Weapon Marketing).

With their most recent marketing onslaught for JITB, the belly laughs are too loud to ignore. Plus, they have done what every marketer must dream about: suckered their competitors into a publicity war from a foolish lawsuit.

The Commercial
In the opening spot of what I expect will be a series of humorous ads, we see spokesperson Jack, a human with the JITB logo for a head, in a boardroom explaining their new sirloin burgers to JITB employees. He uses a chart to illustrate the various parts of a cow, and points out the location of the meat-eaters’ desirable choice, sirloin.

One employee notes that their competition is selling Angus burgers and asks Jack if he would show where find “the Angus area of the cow.”

Pause.

At this point, we watch a puzzled Jack standing by part of the chart, the part displaying what my dad used to call the north end of a south-bound cow.

“I’d rather not,” says Jack, and the spot concludes with their regular branding imagery.

The Reaction
Like lemmings, the people at CKE Restaurants (formerly Carl Karcher Enterprises) have gone to court with paperwork that reportedly claims the JITB commercials create “The erroneous notion that all cuts of Angus beef are derived from the anus of beef cattle.”

So, basically, CKE is saying its customers are too stupid to get the joke.

I suppose this is possible, given the nature of the CKE ads for Carl’s Jr. and Hardee’s restaurants. For years, sloppy eaters have been a mainstay of their ads. One commercial for milk shakes has two male yokels placing their hands on the Angus end of cows and attempting to vibrate them. Get it? Milk . . . shakes.

Another ad has cab drivers talking with their mouths full and insulting women who pass by.

The Comedy Keeps on Coming
Alana Semuels of the Los Angeles Times noted what Dick Sittig told industry magazine Adweek about the JITB “where’s the Angus” campaign. He said that the humor in the spots was “no more crude than a middle-school joke about the planets, or one planet in particular.”

The people at Secret Weapon Marketing are probably enjoying putting in a few extra hours writing snappy one-liners about the Angus fixation of Carl’s and Hardee’s. The braintrust at CKE can only fuss and fume about how misunderstood they are for their Angus love.

Perhaps this is why JITB has sales of $2.7-billion in 2,000 locations while CKE has sales of $1.5-billion from 3,100 locations.

Rules to Live By
I have friends and professional associates in both music and marketing, but in each case, there are certain rules by which we live. One, treat everybody the way you expect to be treated. And two, never go up against a comedian.

[tags]Jack in the Box advertising analysis, CKE lawsuit, marketing, positioning, fast food advertising, advertising industry news, Scott G[/tags]

About John Scott G

John Scott G is a writer of non-fiction and fiction appearing in print, broadcast, and digital media. He frequently works in communications, which means marketing, advertising, and various forms of hype. He is a contributor to eNewsChannels, the Music Industry Newswire, the Advertising Industry Newswire, and others. Visit JohnScottG.com for more information. © John Scott G. (Note: The opinions expressed by The G-Man do not necessarily reflect the opinions or policies of this site or its publisher.)

Discussion

4 comments for “Carl Doesn’t Know Jack or Dick”

  1. Excellent article, Scott-
    very timely, too. I just had a sirloin burger.

    Jack in the Box has a website setup for the campaign, where you can see the commercials, view food facts, and other pithy material designed to make you the butt of any office water cooler humor if repeated out loud:
    http://www.sirloinrules.com

    SIRLOIN RULES! Boycott Carls’ Jr. -
    My Jack antenna ball is ready to rumble!

    I pledge to make my mouth an Angus-free zone. I pledge to be part of fast food history, and eat Jack’s 100% Sirloin Burger. And feel good about it. I pledge to choose my own cheese, choose grilled or red onions, or even add bacon if I want. And I pledge never to have to worry about having Angus on my breath.

    Posted by Christopher Simmons | May 30, 2007, 00:43:07 +0000 UTC
  2. Scott, I referenced your article on a post at http://www.MarketingBlurb.com today. I love your take on this lawsuit. If you follow the link in my post to the YouTube video of the suspect commercial, there are a lot of people responding to the ad and subsequent lawsuit. Particularly amusing, is the YouTube commenter who reminds everyone that angus is a type of cattle, not a cut of beef. I have to assume CKE will drop this lawsuit in the near future. It’s certainly not going the way they planned.

    Posted by Susan Gunelius (MarketingBlurb.com) | May 30, 2007, 20:06:07 +0000 UTC
  3. Mr G

    I think you’re being a little hard on Carl’s marketing. Everyone knows, when you’re selling milk shakes, there is nothing more appetizing than a little Angus stimulation.

    Posted by Phil Hatten | June 1, 2007, 19:58:12 +0000 UTC
  4. When the ad mentioned “Angus” the butt wasn’t actually the first body part I thought of, given the context of the ad.

    I did realize that comparing Angus and sirloin is like comparing, well, apples and oranges, but the humor is so strong it makes little difference.

    Jack’s legal department must have at least discussed the possibility of a negative reaction to the ad. The question is, did Jack goad Carl’s into this lawsuit on purpose or did Jack, like me, think that no one could possibly be that much of an Angus?

    Posted by Pete Marcus | June 2, 2007, 04:13:17 +0000 UTC

Post a comment