<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Verdana Monologues &#8211; When Ikea&#8217;s Designers go Kabookskik</title>
	<atom:link href="http://advertisingindustrynewswire.com/2009/08/30/1156_190137.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://advertisingindustrynewswire.com/2009/08/30/1156_190137.php</link>
	<description>News, Articles and Commentary from the Advertising Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 18:58:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Warren Tenney</title>
		<link>http://advertisingindustrynewswire.com/2009/08/30/1156_190137.php/comment-page-1#comment-199385</link>
		<dc:creator>Warren Tenney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://advertisingindustrynewswire.com/?p=1156#comment-199385</guid>
		<description>I agree that Verdana looks really awful and was a poor choice on Ikea&#039;s part, but I think that that&#039;s their own deal and who&#039;s to argue with that.

The question I have to ask is, is this what our web conventions have driven us to? What is the design world coming to when a company like Ikea is willing to drop their standards this far to accommodate utility.

Is there really NO WAY to make style work with the web?

Also, Chris, I think it&#039;s pointless to pick at the CMYK example, when the rest of Ilaria&#039;s cases made the point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that Verdana looks really awful and was a poor choice on Ikea&#8217;s part, but I think that that&#8217;s their own deal and who&#8217;s to argue with that.</p>
<p>The question I have to ask is, is this what our web conventions have driven us to? What is the design world coming to when a company like Ikea is willing to drop their standards this far to accommodate utility.</p>
<p>Is there really NO WAY to make style work with the web?</p>
<p>Also, Chris, I think it&#8217;s pointless to pick at the CMYK example, when the rest of Ilaria&#8217;s cases made the point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Administrator</title>
		<link>http://advertisingindustrynewswire.com/2009/08/30/1156_190137.php/comment-page-1#comment-199322</link>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 19:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://advertisingindustrynewswire.com/?p=1156#comment-199322</guid>
		<description>Well, Ilaria,
the only disagreement I have with your comment is that typography is also, today, a bit subjective. For example, the use of verdana on Ikea&#039;s latest TV ads, actually looks really good, due to the text chosen. Futura is a lovely font, but it&#039;s also a &quot;lazy designer&quot; font, which is over-used by just about every designer at some point. Also, citing the &quot;@iA tweet&quot; ... Why CMYK? Only printers care about color ... is not really comparable, since CMYK has nothing to do with what printers like or dislike or a &quot;choice&quot; in the matter as with design and typography, it&#039;s a technical requirement to reproduce full color printing to have the 4-colors. C = cyan, M = magenta, Y = yellow, K = keyline/black. You must have CMYK (or more colors) to properly reproduce &quot;full color&quot; material, as found in magazines, brochures, etc.

-- Christopher Simmons</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Ilaria,<br />
the only disagreement I have with your comment is that typography is also, today, a bit subjective. For example, the use of verdana on Ikea&#8217;s latest TV ads, actually looks really good, due to the text chosen. Futura is a lovely font, but it&#8217;s also a &#8220;lazy designer&#8221; font, which is over-used by just about every designer at some point. Also, citing the &#8220;@iA tweet&#8221; &#8230; Why CMYK? Only printers care about color &#8230; is not really comparable, since CMYK has nothing to do with what printers like or dislike or a &#8220;choice&#8221; in the matter as with design and typography, it&#8217;s a technical requirement to reproduce full color printing to have the 4-colors. C = cyan, M = magenta, Y = yellow, K = keyline/black. You must have CMYK (or more colors) to properly reproduce &#8220;full color&#8221; material, as found in magazines, brochures, etc.</p>
<p>&#8211; Christopher Simmons</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ilaria</title>
		<link>http://advertisingindustrynewswire.com/2009/08/30/1156_190137.php/comment-page-1#comment-199321</link>
		<dc:creator>Ilaria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 12:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://advertisingindustrynewswire.com/?p=1156#comment-199321</guid>
		<description>it is probably true that within the graphic community, some of these designers protest because Verdana is a Microsoft font. But I do agree with those who say that this is a sad typographic choice. It&#039;s all about that: it&#039;s like choosing the wrong colour or the wrong paper. People always say about our job that, eventually, graphic design is a matter of personal taste. But we all know that it&#039;s not like that. Good typography means culture: and culture seems to lack in this choice of Verdana for Ikea. That&#039;s the important aspect of this issue. I quote the @iA tweet about that:
&quot;Why edit? Only writers notice bad copy! Why CMYK? Only printers care about color! Why even think? Only philosophers analyze thoughts.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it is probably true that within the graphic community, some of these designers protest because Verdana is a Microsoft font. But I do agree with those who say that this is a sad typographic choice. It&#8217;s all about that: it&#8217;s like choosing the wrong colour or the wrong paper. People always say about our job that, eventually, graphic design is a matter of personal taste. But we all know that it&#8217;s not like that. Good typography means culture: and culture seems to lack in this choice of Verdana for Ikea. That&#8217;s the important aspect of this issue. I quote the @iA tweet about that:<br />
&#8220;Why edit? Only writers notice bad copy! Why CMYK? Only printers care about color! Why even think? Only philosophers analyze thoughts.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nitrofurano</title>
		<link>http://advertisingindustrynewswire.com/2009/08/30/1156_190137.php/comment-page-1#comment-199312</link>
		<dc:creator>nitrofurano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 09:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://advertisingindustrynewswire.com/?p=1156#comment-199312</guid>
		<description>replacing Futura with Verdana as anti-snob attitude from IKEA? for gods sake...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>replacing Futura with Verdana as anti-snob attitude from IKEA? for gods sake&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nitrofurano</title>
		<link>http://advertisingindustrynewswire.com/2009/08/30/1156_190137.php/comment-page-1#comment-199309</link>
		<dc:creator>nitrofurano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 21:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://advertisingindustrynewswire.com/?p=1156#comment-199309</guid>
		<description>the choice for Verdana from IKEA is completelly disastrous - &#039;in short passages&#039; we see that &#039;I&#039; weird serifs (in an unserifed typeface?) and the bridge from &#039;A&#039; completelly unbalanced - IKEA, please get rid of Verdana, for gods sake...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the choice for Verdana from IKEA is completelly disastrous &#8211; &#8216;in short passages&#8217; we see that &#8216;I&#8217; weird serifs (in an unserifed typeface?) and the bridge from &#8216;A&#8217; completelly unbalanced &#8211; IKEA, please get rid of Verdana, for gods sake&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: contextfree</title>
		<link>http://advertisingindustrynewswire.com/2009/08/30/1156_190137.php/comment-page-1#comment-199308</link>
		<dc:creator>contextfree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 17:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://advertisingindustrynewswire.com/?p=1156#comment-199308</guid>
		<description>In WPF 4.0 (currently in beta) the font rendering stack has been rebuilt to allow more GDI-like appearance at small sizes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In WPF 4.0 (currently in beta) the font rendering stack has been rebuilt to allow more GDI-like appearance at small sizes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://advertisingindustrynewswire.com/2009/08/30/1156_190137.php/comment-page-1#comment-199307</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 15:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://advertisingindustrynewswire.com/?p=1156#comment-199307</guid>
		<description>You are correct.

This is nothing more than the usual designer snobbishness (see: interviews in the documentary &quot;Helvetica&quot; -- some of the snobbishness on display just make you want to go over and slap these famous designers).  Plus, it brings in the whole Mac vs. PC thing that&#039;s been going on for twenty years.  I mean, people are still angry at Microsoft for choosing Arial over Helvetica (funny, they somehow didn&#039;t give Microsoft credit for choosing Times New Roman over Times Roman).

I personally don&#039;t like reading extended text in Verdana.  But short passages look OK.  And isn&#039;t that exactly what Ikea does in its catalogs?

P.S. The reason that Georgia doesn&#039;t look as nice in Windows is that GDI/GDI+ tend to slam things down to the pixel grid when executing the hinting program, in order to improve legibility at small font sizes.  Mac OS X tends not to do that.  The new Windows graphics API, WPF, also doesn&#039;t do that (which is actually bad for small font sizes -- I wish Microsoft had had the guts to stick with the original design choice instead of giving in to the design community).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are correct.</p>
<p>This is nothing more than the usual designer snobbishness (see: interviews in the documentary &#8220;Helvetica&#8221; &#8212; some of the snobbishness on display just make you want to go over and slap these famous designers).  Plus, it brings in the whole Mac vs. PC thing that&#8217;s been going on for twenty years.  I mean, people are still angry at Microsoft for choosing Arial over Helvetica (funny, they somehow didn&#8217;t give Microsoft credit for choosing Times New Roman over Times Roman).</p>
<p>I personally don&#8217;t like reading extended text in Verdana.  But short passages look OK.  And isn&#8217;t that exactly what Ikea does in its catalogs?</p>
<p>P.S. The reason that Georgia doesn&#8217;t look as nice in Windows is that GDI/GDI+ tend to slam things down to the pixel grid when executing the hinting program, in order to improve legibility at small font sizes.  Mac OS X tends not to do that.  The new Windows graphics API, WPF, also doesn&#8217;t do that (which is actually bad for small font sizes &#8212; I wish Microsoft had had the guts to stick with the original design choice instead of giving in to the design community).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://advertisingindustrynewswire.com/2009/08/30/1156_190137.php/comment-page-1#comment-199300</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 23:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://advertisingindustrynewswire.com/?p=1156#comment-199300</guid>
		<description>lolol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lolol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

